[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1362454103-391-1-git-send-email-raphael.scarv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 00:28:23 -0300
From: "Raphael S.Carvalho" <raphael.scarv@...il.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Raphael S.Carvalho" <raphael.scarv@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] kernel/pid_namespace.c: Fixing a lack of cleanup (Probable resources leak).
Starting point: create_pid_namespace()
Suppose create_pid_cachep() was executed sucessfully, thus:
pcache was allocated by kmalloc().
cachep received a cache created by kmem_cache_create().
and pcache->list was added to the list pid_caches_lh.
So what would happen if proc_alloc_inum() returns an error?
The resources allocated by create_pid_namespace() would be deallocated!
How about those resources allocated by create_pid_cachep()?
By knowing that, I created this patch in order to fix that!
Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv@...il.com>
---
kernel/pid_namespace.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/pid_namespace.c b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
index c1c3dc1..d94e4b6 100644
--- a/kernel/pid_namespace.c
+++ b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *pid_ns_cachep;
* @nr_ids: the number of numerical ids this pid will have to carry
*/
-static struct kmem_cache *create_pid_cachep(int nr_ids)
+static struct pid_cache *create_pid_cachep(int nr_ids)
{
struct pid_cache *pcache;
struct kmem_cache *cachep;
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *create_pid_cachep(int nr_ids)
list_add(&pcache->list, &pid_caches_lh);
out:
mutex_unlock(&pid_caches_mutex);
- return pcache->cachep;
+ return pcache;
err_cachep:
kfree(pcache);
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static struct pid_namespace *create_pid_namespace(struct user_namespace *user_ns
struct pid_namespace *parent_pid_ns)
{
struct pid_namespace *ns;
+ struct pid_cache *pcache;
unsigned int level = parent_pid_ns->level + 1;
int i;
int err;
@@ -103,15 +104,16 @@ static struct pid_namespace *create_pid_namespace(struct user_namespace *user_ns
if (!ns->pidmap[0].page)
goto out_free;
- ns->pid_cachep = create_pid_cachep(level + 1);
- if (ns->pid_cachep == NULL)
+ pcache = create_pid_cachep(level + 1);
+ if (pcache == NULL)
goto out_free_map;
err = proc_alloc_inum(&ns->proc_inum);
if (err)
- goto out_free_map;
+ goto out_free_cachep;
kref_init(&ns->kref);
+ ns->pid_cachep = pcache->cachep;
ns->level = level;
ns->parent = get_pid_ns(parent_pid_ns);
ns->user_ns = get_user_ns(user_ns);
@@ -126,6 +128,10 @@ static struct pid_namespace *create_pid_namespace(struct user_namespace *user_ns
return ns;
+out_free_cachep:
+ kmem_cache_destroy(pcache->cachep);
+ list_del(&pcache->list);
+ kfree(pcache);
out_free_map:
kfree(ns->pidmap[0].page);
out_free:
--
1.7.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists