linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] acerhdf: Fix fan activation with new thermal governor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1362555028.2441.21.camel@rzhang1-mobl4>
Date:	Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:30:28 +0800
From:	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>, Peter Feuerer <peter@...e.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@...el.com>,
	Alexander Lam <azl@...rew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acerhdf: Fix fan activation with new thermal governor

On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 08:00 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 11:47:20AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > So this now does not have any of the Schmitt trigger equivalent (?)
> > > governor changes that were nicely discussed in this activity -
> > > So what do we want to have committed, and what do we not,
> > 
> > the problem should have been fixed in 3.9-rc1 by
> > commit b8bb6cb999858043489c1ddef08eed2127559169
> > Author: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> > Date:   Thu Nov 22 15:45:02 2012 +0800
> > 
> >     step_wise: Unify the code for both throttle and dethrottle
> > 
> >     Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> > 
> > I'll send Alexander' patch for 3.8 stable.
> 
> Hold on, do I understand it correctly that this is yet another patch
> that "fixes" it?

sorry I should be clearer.
the problem that alexander' patch fixes, does not exist in 3.9-rc1
because the problem is fixed by this commit
b8bb6cb999858043489c1ddef08eed2127559169.

so what we need is, either 3.8.x kernel + alexander's patch, or clean
3.9-rc1.

>  If so, maybe we should test 3.9-rc1 which contains the
> said patch above? Yes, no?
> 
> Also, I don't see Alexander's patch applied anywhere so if it isn't
> upstream, you can't send it to stable.
> 
then I'll back port b8bb6cb999858043489c1ddef08eed2127559169 for 3.8
stable.

thanks,
rui

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/