linux-kernel - Re: [REPOST PATCH 0/2] Table lookup for mux clock type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:52:11 +0200
From:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC:	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	"Prashant Gaikwad" <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REPOST PATCH 0/2] Table lookup for mux clock type

On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 12:52:02AM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 03:48 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 02/22/2013 08:02 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> >> This patchset adds a table lookup feature to the mux clock type. This will
> >> be used by the forthcoming Tegra114 clock implementation. Also instead of
> >> a fixed field width, a mask is used. This is because Tegra114 has some muxes
> >> where the parent selector is spread over several bitfields. The second patch
> >> adapts the tegra periph clock implementation which uses struct clk_mux
> >> directly.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Mike,
> >>
> >> This patch is a dependency for the Tegra114 CCF implementation. Could you
> >> review it and merge on a topic branch so Stephen can pull it in to verify
> >> the integration?
> > 
> > Peter, does this repost you resolve the issue I pointed out at:
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220873.html
> 
> Indeed, I just tested applying patch 1/2 and the build is broken without
> patch 2/2.
> 
> Can you either rework the patches to maintain bisectability, or squash
> the two together?

Will squash them together.

Cheers,

Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/