linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 0/8] pv event interface between host and guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Mar 2013 16:46:58 +0800
From:	Hu Tao <hutao@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc:	kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@...il.com>,
	Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@...hat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
	Juan Quintela <quintela@...hat.com>,
	Orit Wasserman <owasserm@...hat.com>,
	Kevin Wolf <kwolf@...hat.com>,
	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/8] pv event interface between host and guest

On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 11:17:38AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 08:13:10PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> > This series implements a new interface, kvm pv event, to notify host when
> > some events happen in guest. Right now there is one supported event: guest
> > panic.
> > 
> What other event do you have in mind? Is interface generic enough to
> accommodate future, yet unknown, events. It allows to pass only one
> integer specifying even type, what if additional info is needed? My be

guest crash, lockup, or warning.[1] But the first purpose is to do panic
notification(panic event). Since at the point the guest is panicked, I
think it's better to keep the interface as simple as possible.

[1] http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/PVCrashDetection

> stop pretending that device is generic and make it do once thing but do

you mean make the interface just do panic notification?

> it well? For generic even passing interface (whatever it may be needed
> for) much more powerful virtio should be used.
> 
> On implementation itself I do not understand why is this kvm specific.
> The only thing that makes it so is that you hook device initialization
> into guest kvm initialization code, but this is obviously incorrect.
> What stops QEMU tcg or Xen from reusing the same device for the same
> purpose except the artificial limitation in a guest.
> 
> Reading data from a random ioports is not how you discover platform
> devices in 21 century (and the data you read from unassigned port is not
> guarantied to be zero, it may depend on QEMU version), you use ACPI for
> that and Marcelo already pointed that to you. Having little knowledge of
> ACPI (we all do) is not a good reason to not doing it. We probably need
> to reserve QEMU specific ACPI Plug and Play hardware ID to define our own

Do we have to request the ID from some orgnazation?

> devices. After that you will be able to create device with _HID(QEMU0001)

QMU0001, I think. EISA ID requires it to have only 3 letters for PNP ID.

> in DSDT that supplies address information (ioport to use) and capability
> supported. Guest uses acpi_get_devices() to discover a platform device by
> its name (QEMU0001).  Then you put the driver for the platform device
> into drivers/platform/x86/ and QEMU/kvm/Xen all will be able to use it.

Thanks for the information!

> 
> On QEMU side of things I cannot comment much on how QOMified the device
> is (it should be), I hope other reviews will verify it, but I noticed
> that device is only initialized for PIIX, what about Q35?
> 
> --
> 			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/