[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130306103120.GA16827@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 11:31:20 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: remove include of cgroup.h from perf_event.h
* Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> wrote:
> > - * This is a per-cpu dynamically allocated data structure.
> > - */
> > -struct perf_cgroup_info {
> > - u64 time;
> > - u64 timestamp;
> > -};
> > -
> > -struct perf_cgroup {
> > - struct cgroup_subsys_state css;
> > - struct perf_cgroup_info *info; /* timing info, one per cpu */
> > -};
> > -#endif
> > -
> > +struct perf_cgroup;
>
> The problem is that you have struct perf_cgroup in the struct perf_event
> structure. Today, this field is not referenced outside of kernel/events/core.c But
> it is available outside this file. If someday the field is reference, your changes
> will have to do reverted. So I am wondering what is the point of the change right
> now?
It's standard practice to not define the type for task_struct or other kernel
subsystems.
For example slab caches can be created via kmem_cache_create() anywhere in the tree,
but the internal structure is only known to the SLAB subsystem.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists