[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130306011623.GG1227@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 17:16:23 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
"Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: LOCKDEP: 3.9-rc1: mount.nfs/4272 still has locks held!
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:05:07PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> If it's really just a 2-line patch to try_to_freeze(), could it just be
> carried out-of-tree by people that are specifically working on tracking
> down these problems?
>
> But I don't have strong feelings about it--as long as it doesn't result
> in the same known issues getting reported again and again....
Agreed, I don't think a Kconfig option is justified for this. If this
is really important, annotate broken paths so that it doesn't trigger
spuriously; otherwise, please just remove it.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists