| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1362568771.18799.167.camel@thor.lan>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 06:19:31 -0500
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: lockdep trace from kill_fasync (tty) vs account (random)
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 22:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> Came home to this on my box that I left fuzz-testing.
>
> [56194.899379] ======================================================
> [56194.899529] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> [56194.899679] 3.9.0-rc1+ #67 Not tainted
> [56194.899769] -------------------------------------------------------
> [56194.899920] modprobe/14420 is trying to acquire lock:
> [56194.900041] blocked: (&(&new->fa_lock)->rlock){......}, instance: ffff8800c240b4b8, at: [<ffffffff811c31d6>] kill_fasync+0x96/0x2a0
> [56194.900343]
> but task is already holding lock:
> [56194.900478] held: (nonblocking_pool.lock){..-...}, instance: ffffffff81ca99a0, at: [<ffffffff81417909>] account+0x39/0x1c0
> [56194.900765]
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
Hi Dave,
Turns out it's a problem in random.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/4/295
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists