[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130306134004.16252a21@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 13:40:04 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: LOCKDEP: 3.9-rc1: mount.nfs/4272 still has locks held!
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 19:17:35 +0100
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 03/05, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >
> > Anyone up for working out how to handle a freeze event on a process
> > that already has a pending signal, while it's being ptraced?
>
> Could you explain the problem?
>
Not very well. I was just saying that the signal/ptrace stuff is very
complicated already. Now we're looking at mixing in the freezer too,
which further increases the complexity.
Though when I said that, it was before Tejun mentioned hooking this up
to ptrace. I'll confess that I don't fully understand what he's
proposing either though...
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists