[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5137C404.9060902@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:32:36 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
CC: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux@....linux.org.uk,
arnd@...db.de, olof@...om.net,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: 3.9-rc1 regression in arm dtb build
On 03/06/2013 12:33 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Commit
>
> commit 499cd8298628eeabf0eb5eb6525d4faa0eec80d8
> Author: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> Date: Tue Nov 27 16:29:11 2012 -0700
>
> The current rules have the .dtb files build in a different
> directory
> from the .dts files. The only reason for this is that it was what
> PowerPC has done historically. This patch changes ARM to use the
> generic dtb rule which builds .dtb files in the same directory as the
> source .dts.
>
> --
>
> Moves dtb files from arch/arm/boot/ to arch/arm/boot/dtb. That causes
> several problems:
>
> 1) it is inconsistent with 3.8, making switching between 3.9-rc1 and
> 3.8 tricky
It's pretty easy to locate the DTB by automatically looking in
arch/*/boot/dts first, then if the file doesn't exist there, looking in
arch/*/boot instead as a legacy fallback.
> 2) what is worse, it is very easy to do stuff like
>
> make socfpga_cyclone5.dtb
>
> and you end up with success, but stale file in arch/arm/boot, where
> your scripts expect it.
>
> (There are some attempts to rm stale files in Makefiles; they don't
> work in above case).
I guess moving the rm into cmd_dtc rather than the "dtbs" rule would
solve that.
> 3) it is now incosistent between powerpc and arm.
True. PPC's DTB-handling is a little more complex than most, so wasn't
converted along with this patch. It'd be nice to finish the conversion
and make PPC pick up this change too.
> 4) device tree _binary_ files are now output in device tree _source_
> directory
Isn't that true for almost all object files? One of the motivators for
the move was that binaries were being built in a different directory to
the source, which is quite odd.
> (Sorry for noticing this earlier).
>
> I believe the commit should be simply reverted. Reasons to move dtbs
> around are not good enough.
> Pavel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists