linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] clk: tegra: provide dummy cpu car ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:20:00 -0800
From:	Andrew Chew <AChew@...dia.com>
To:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC:	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] clk: tegra: provide dummy cpu car ops

> Subject: [PATCH] clk: tegra: provide dummy cpu car ops
> 
> tegra_boot_secondary() relies on some of the car ops. This means having an
> uninitialized tegra_cpu_car_ops will lead to an early boot panic.
> Providing a dummy struct avoids this and makes adding Tegra114 clock
> support in a bisectable way a lot easier.
> 
> --
> 
> Stephen,
> 
> Should this be a separate patch or should I make this part of new release of
> the Tegra114 clock series?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c index
> a603b9a..f6c141f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,8 @@
>  #include "clk.h"
> 
>  /* Global data of Tegra CPU CAR ops */
> -struct tegra_cpu_car_ops *tegra_cpu_car_ops;

Sorry for bringing this up so late...
Shouldn't the above be "struct tegra_cpu_car_ops tegra_cpu_car_ops;"?

> +static struct tegra_cpu_car_ops *dummy_car_ops; struct
> +tegra_cpu_car_ops *tegra_cpu_car_ops = &dummy_car_ops;
> 
>  void __init tegra_init_dup_clks(struct tegra_clk_duplicate *dup_list,
>  				struct clk *clks[], int clk_max)
> --
> 1.7.7.rc0.72.g4b5ea.dirty
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the
> body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/