[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130306002615.GA20530@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 00:26:15 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: proc: Add Krait proc info
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:03:10PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/05/13 00:34, Will Deacon wrote:
> > I was looking at this the other day and wondered whether we could set
> > HWCAP_IDIV in __v7_setup, depending on ID_ISAR0[27:24]. I can't immediately
> > think why that would be difficult, but similarly there may well be a reason
> > why we assign it like this.
> >
> > Fancy taking a look?
>
> Ok I'll take a look. Should we be masking out HWCAP_IDIVT on
> !CONFIG_ARM_THUMB configurations?
Yes, that's not a bad idea. It makes the IDIV* caps follow what we do for
the others (vfp etc) by only advertising support if the relevant CONFIG
options are selected.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists