[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVOcacLS82Mw1uMmC=VhYPkzqzdHnXa93QqZjAOz2gfM3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 12:00:14 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: keep __my_cpu_offset consistent with generic one
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
>
> For the record, can you include a backtrace or something please? The
lock_release_holdtime() will access percpu variable, so every lock
release may trigger the hang if CONFIG_LOCK_STAT is enabled,
and there are many lock acquire/release before setup_arch.
No detailed backtrace since only early_printk can work at that time.
> description makes it sounds like a caller bug, so it would be good to
> document a valid user of per-cpu before cpu_init().
OK, I will add the document: lockdep will use percpu variable
before cpu_init() called inside setup_arch().
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists