[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8yaobevvl71.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:21:54 -0800
From: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ssbi: Fix exit mismatch in remove function
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:29:44PM -0800, David Brown wrote:
>> msm_ssbi_remove is referenced with __exit_p, but not declared with
>> __exit. This causes a warning when the driver is not built as a
>> module:
>>
>> drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c:341:23: warning: 'msm_ssbi_remove' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>
>> Fix by adding the __exit declaration to the function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c b/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c
>> index 86d8416..4d503da 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c
>> @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ err_get_mem_res:
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static int msm_ssbi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +static int __exit msm_ssbi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> No, remove the __exit_p marking instead, unless you want your kernel to
> be oopsed :)
Thanks. Oopsing is not fun.
David
--
sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists