[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1362639311.5290.28.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 22:55:11 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>,
Lucas Stach <dev@...xeye.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] get_maintainer: prevent keywords from matching
filenames
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 23:47 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 05:40 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Which is why I showed the whole thing in a single patch.
> > No worries if it's simply to increase the patch count...
>
> I'm not sure what showed refers to?
The changes I posted with the suggestion
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/6/468
> I guess if I squashed /everything/ into a single commit (i.e. the change
> to the Tegra section in MAINTAINERS too) then there wouldn't be any
> bisect issues. I really don't care about patch count. The reason for >1
> patch is that there's often push-back if doing logically separate things
> (adding N: feature, modifying a MAINTAINERS entry to use it, removing
> part of K: feature) in a single patch...
Not from me anyway.
I think it's a single logical change and
it's trivial too.
No worries whatever happens.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists