[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130307072129.17719.81530.stgit@zurg>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 11:21:29 +0400
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] procfs: fix rcu-lock/unlock in proc_reg_open() and
proc_reg_release()
fix for a21813be23329e2788164eab532e79cb0e513cfc (linux-next)
"procfs: improve scaling in proc"
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Cc: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
fs/proc/inode.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c
index 6cccc4d..073846c 100644
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int proc_reg_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
atomic_inc(&pde->pde_users);
open = fops->open;
release = fops->release;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
if (open)
rv = open(inode, file);
@@ -400,6 +400,7 @@ static int proc_reg_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
rcu_read_lock();
fops = rcu_dereference(pde->proc_fops);
if (!fops) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
/*
* Can't simply exit, __fput() will think that everything is OK,
* and move on to freeing struct file. remove_proc_entry() will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists