[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51385BA5.7020706@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:49:33 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiannan Ouyang <ouyang@...pitt.edu>,
"Andrew M. Theurer" <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] kvm: Record the preemption status of vcpus using
preempt notifiers
On 03/05/2013 08:49 PM, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> On 3/4/2013 10:02 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>> From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Note that we mark as preempted only when vcpu's task state was
>> Running during preemption.
>>
>> Thanks Jiannan, Avi for preemption notifier ideas. Thanks Gleb, PeterZ
>> for their precious suggestions. Thanks Srikar for an idea on avoiding
>> rcu lock while checking task state that improved overcommit numbers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 5 +++++
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> index cad77fe..0b31e1c 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu {
>> bool dy_eligible;
>> } spin_loop;
>> #endif
>> + bool preempted;
>> struct kvm_vcpu_arch arch;
>> };
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> index adc68fe..83a804c 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct
>> kvm *kvm, unsigned id)
>> kvm_vcpu_set_in_spin_loop(vcpu, false);
>> kvm_vcpu_set_dy_eligible(vcpu, false);
>> + vcpu->preempted = false;
>> r = kvm_arch_vcpu_init(vcpu);
>> if (r < 0)
>> @@ -2902,6 +2903,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(struct
>> preempt_notifier *pn)
>> static void kvm_sched_in(struct preempt_notifier *pn, int cpu)
>> {
>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(pn);
>> + if (vcpu->preempted)
>> + vcpu->preempted = false;
>> kvm_arch_vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu);
>> }
>> @@ -2911,6 +2914,8 @@ static void kvm_sched_out(struct
>> preempt_notifier *pn,
>> {
>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(pn);
>> + if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING)
>> + vcpu->preempted = true;
>> kvm_arch_vcpu_put(vcpu);
>> }
>>
>> .
>>
> Reviewed-by: Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>
Thank you Vinod.
Gleb, Marcelo,
any comment, concern on the patches?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists