[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1303071526040.28677@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 15:26:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>,
Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] HID: Extend the interface with idle requests
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> Some drivers send the idle command directly to underlying device,
> creating an unwanted dependency on the underlying transport layer.
> This patch adds hid_hw_idle() to the interface, thereby removing
> usbhid from the lion share of the drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> include/linux/hid.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> index 420466b..effcd3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> @@ -1253,6 +1253,20 @@ static void usbhid_request(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *rep, int r
> }
> }
>
> +static int usbhid_idle(struct hid_device *hid, int report, int idle,
> + int reqtype)
Where does the need for passing the report argument come from please?
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists