[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130307013042.GB2910@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 09:30:42 +0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ssbi: Fix exit mismatch in remove function
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:29:44PM -0800, David Brown wrote:
> msm_ssbi_remove is referenced with __exit_p, but not declared with
> __exit. This causes a warning when the driver is not built as a
> module:
>
> drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c:341:23: warning: 'msm_ssbi_remove' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>
> Fix by adding the __exit declaration to the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c b/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c
> index 86d8416..4d503da 100644
> --- a/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ssbi/ssbi.c
> @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ err_get_mem_res:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int msm_ssbi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int __exit msm_ssbi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
No, remove the __exit_p marking instead, unless you want your kernel to
be oopsed :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists