[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <513911F9.8050308@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:17:29 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
CC: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efivars: Allow disabling use as a pstore backend
On 03/07/2013 02:15 PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
>>>
>>> What about a command line option?
>>
>> That could be done. I'm assuming you want this instead of a config
>> option, defaulted to on?
>>
>> How would you feel about a config option for the default value of the
>> command line option? I intend to default this to off in Ubuntu for a
>> while as a colleague's machine was recently bricked on two different
>> occasions after the kernel oopsed. The config option would simplify
>> things a bit for us, though we could always carry a patch changing the
>> default value.
>
> Not sure why a command line option would be a more natural solution to
> this problem? The original patch looked fine to me. All other pstore
> backends are guarded by Kconfig options.
>
> Though I could see an argument for a kernel parameter to turn off the
> EFI pstore backend code, even if it's compiled into the kernel. But that
> would be better as an additional patch.
>
That way it can be enabled if needed, without the user having to build
their own kernel.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists