[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hx1BzTtYSBp8zP+E1DNwgtErJJHN_aqagbss8SCryZBYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 00:35:47 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/33] nohz: Basic full dynticks interface
2013/2/11 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:08:07AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> [ … ]
>
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
>> index 8601f0d..dc6381d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
>> +++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
>> @@ -70,6 +70,15 @@ config NO_HZ
>> only trigger on an as-needed basis both when the system is
>> busy and when the system is idle.
>>
>> +config NO_HZ_FULL
>> + bool "Full tickless system"
>
> I think you want to say here "Almost-completely tickless system".
> "Almost" because of that one CPU outside of the range :-)
I think that "Full dynticks system" would express well what happens?
>
>> + depends on NO_HZ && RCU_USER_QS && VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN && RCU_NOCB_CPU && SMP
>> + select CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE
>> + help
>> + Try to be tickless everywhere, not just in idle. (You need
>> + to fill up the full_nohz_mask boot parameter).
>> +
>> +
>> config HIGH_RES_TIMERS
>> bool "High Resolution Timer Support"
>> depends on !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET && GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
>> index 314b9ee..494a2aa 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
>> @@ -142,6 +142,29 @@ static void tick_sched_handle(struct tick_sched *ts, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING);
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
>> +static cpumask_var_t full_nohz_mask;
>> +bool have_full_nohz_mask;
>> +
>> +int tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + if (!have_full_nohz_mask)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, full_nohz_mask);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Parse the boot-time nohz CPU list from the kernel parameters. */
>> +static int __init tick_nohz_full_setup(char *str)
>> +{
>> + alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&full_nohz_mask);
>> + have_full_nohz_mask = true;
>> + cpulist_parse(str, full_nohz_mask);
>
> Don't you want to check retval of cpulist_parse first here before
> assigning have_full_nohz_mask and allocating cpumask var?
>
> We don't trust userspace, you know.
Yeah sure. I was really in draft/laboratory mode until now. But I
guess I need to start thinking about such details, since nobody seem
to oppose with the whole design. Time to zoom in.
>
>> + return 1;
>> +}
>> +__setup("full_nohz=", tick_nohz_full_setup);
>
> I'd guess this kernel parameter needs to go into
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt along with a referral to
> Documentation/cputopology.txt which explains how to specify cpulists for
> n00bs like me :-)
Sure, I'll add that on my TODO list.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists