[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5139AC39.90805@imgtec.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:15:37 +0000
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
<linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
<uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC -next] linux/linkage.h: fix symbol prefix handling
Hi Rusty,
On 08/03/13 00:03, Rusty Russell wrote:
> James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com> writes:
>> Also the definition of SYMBOL_PREFIX in <linux/kernel.h> is removed as
>> it conflicts, isn't used anywhere, and is defined as a string so differs
>> from the assembly definition.
>
> So now, if CONFIG_SYMBOL_PREFIX, SYMBOL_PREFIX is defined on the cmdline
> as a string. Otherwise it's empty (not the empty string?):
No, SYMBOL_PREFIX is now defined as a non-string, same as asm files, but
the now unused definition in linux/kernel.h did define it as a string as
it used CONFIG_SYMBOL_PREFIX which is a string. When I said "and is
defined as a string" I was referring to the one in linux/kernel.h that
this removes.
Does that make sense? It's all a bit messy unfortunately (hence RFC).
Cheers
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists