[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130308120115.GA18712@longonot.mountain>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 15:01:15 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Anil Gurumurthy <agurumur@...cade.com>
Cc: Vijaya Mohan Guvva <vmohan@...cade.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] [SCSI] bfa: Use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
This is always called with spinlocks held so it should use
GFP_ATOMIC. The call tree is:
-> bfad_drv_start()
Takes spin_lock_irqsave(&bfad->bfad_lock, flags);
-> bfa_fcs_pbc_vport_init()
-> bfa_fcb_pbc_vport_create()
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c
index a5f7690..d144a06 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ bfa_fcb_pbc_vport_create(struct bfad_s *bfad, struct bfi_pbc_vport_s pbc_vport)
struct bfad_vport_s *vport;
int rc;
- vport = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bfad_vport_s), GFP_KERNEL);
+ vport = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bfad_vport_s), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!vport) {
bfa_trc(bfad, 0);
return;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists