linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/10] dmatest: split test parameters to separate structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1362748065.28241.159.camel@smile>
Date:	Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:07:45 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] dmatest: split test parameters to separate
 structure

On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:16 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote: 
> On 4 March 2013 17:09, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Better to keep test parameters separate from internal variables.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/dma/dmatest.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> 
> Though i don't feel a real need of keeping this in separate patches.
> We can have one for fixing these :)

Do you mean to merge patche 3,4, and 5 into one?


-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/