[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130308145306.GA24085@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:53:07 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: pipe_release oops.
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 04:21:13PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > The hits keep on coming..
> >
> > [ 255.609172] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000064
> > [ 255.610393] IP: [<ffffffff811bad62>] pipe_release+0x42/0xd0
>
> Ok, I think this is the same issue as your fasync thing.
>
> So add a "if (pipe) { }" in pipe_release() too.
Yeah, that does the trick.
I changed your other diff a little to use a goto, which reduces a level of indentation..
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index 64a494c..49ba9cc 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -740,6 +740,9 @@ pipe_release(struct inode *inode, int decr, int decw)
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
pipe = inode->i_pipe;
+ if (!pipe)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
pipe->readers -= decr;
pipe->writers -= decw;
@@ -750,6 +753,8 @@ pipe_release(struct inode *inode, int decr, int decw)
kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_readers, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
}
+
+out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
return 0;
@@ -759,10 +764,11 @@ static int
pipe_read_fasync(int fd, struct file *filp, int on)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
- int retval;
+ int retval = 0;
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
- retval = fasync_helper(fd, filp, on, &inode->i_pipe->fasync_readers);
+ if (inode->i_pipe)
+ retval = fasync_helper(fd, filp, on, &inode->i_pipe->fasync_readers);
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
return retval;
@@ -773,10 +779,11 @@ static int
pipe_write_fasync(int fd, struct file *filp, int on)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
- int retval;
+ int retval = 0;
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
- retval = fasync_helper(fd, filp, on, &inode->i_pipe->fasync_writers);
+ if (inode->i_pipe)
+ retval = fasync_helper(fd, filp, on, &inode->i_pipe->fasync_writers);
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
return retval;
@@ -787,16 +794,22 @@ static int
pipe_rdwr_fasync(int fd, struct file *filp, int on)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
- struct pipe_inode_info *pipe = inode->i_pipe;
- int retval;
+ struct pipe_inode_info *pipe;
+ int retval = 0;
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
+ pipe = inode->i_pipe;
+ if (!pipe)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
retval = fasync_helper(fd, filp, on, &pipe->fasync_readers);
if (retval >= 0) {
retval = fasync_helper(fd, filp, on, &pipe->fasync_writers);
if (retval < 0) /* this can happen only if on == T */
fasync_helper(-1, filp, 0, &pipe->fasync_readers);
}
+
+out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
return retval;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists