[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130308175931.135352630@goodmis.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:59:31 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>,
Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>,
hcochran@...mark.com,
Hiraku Toyooka <hiraku.toyooka.gu@...achi.com>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 0/2] tracing: Snapshot command line and branch tracer fix
Two more patches to my queue. I added alloc_snapshot to the kernel
command line parameter to alloc allocation of the snapshot buffer
when the main tracing buffer is allocated, allowing the use of
tracing_snapshot() without the fear of it not being allocated.
Also Fengguang Wu's tests discovered that my changes broke the branch
tracer. I guess I should add that to my test suite ;-)
Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) (2):
tracing: Add alloc_snapshot kernel command line parameter
tracing: Fix the branch tracer that broke with buffer change
----
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 7 +++
kernel/trace/trace.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
kernel/trace/trace.h | 2 +-
kernel/trace/trace_branch.c | 4 +-
kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 4 +-
5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists