[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51394DF1.1030708@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:33:21 +0800
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: wakeup buddy
On 03/08/2013 01:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 15:06 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>> +static inline int wakeup_related(struct task_struct *p)
>> +{
>> + if (wakeup_buddy(p, current)) {
>> + /*
>> + * Now check whether current still focus on his buddy.
>> + */
>> + if (wakeup_buddy(current, p))
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> Not commenting on the thing in general, but:
>
> static inline bool wakeup_related(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> return wakeup_buddy(p, current) && wakeup_buddy(current, p);
> }
>
> is far shorter and easier to read :-)
Right, I will correct it :)
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists