[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1303082108590.22263@ionos>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 21:10:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/26] x86, irq: Modify irq chip once for irq
remapping
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> > Now after irq remapping is enabled, irq_chip fields are modified during
> > every irq setup.
> >
> > Only need to change them one during we enable irq mapping.
>
> Can you please start to write sensible changelogs? I'm really sick of
> your sloppyness.
>
> > Also change irq_remap_modify_chip_defaults() to __init.
>
> Why can you do that ?
>
> > We don't need to use #ifdef in irq_remap_modify_chips(), as
> > IRQ_REMAP only support x86_64 AND X86_IO_APIC AND PCI_MSI,
> > also HPET_TIMER is set when x86_64 is set.
>
> You should not describe what the patch is doing, you are again missing
> to describe why the patch is doing this.
And just for clarification. If you are not going to provide proper
changelogs for _all_ patches of the series, this stuff is going
directly towards /dev/null. I'm not wasting my time to review any of
that otherwise.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists