[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1362783019.2370.45.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:50:19 +0000
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: dgilbert@...erlog.com
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] [SCSI] scsi_transport_sas: check for allocation failure
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 12:57 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> On 13-03-08 07:02 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Static checkers complain that this allocation isn't checked. We
> > should return zero if the allocation fails.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c
> > index 1b68142..a022997 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c
> > @@ -379,9 +379,12 @@ sas_tlr_supported(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> > {
> > const int vpd_len = 32;
> > struct sas_end_device *rdev = sas_sdev_to_rdev(sdev);
> > - char *buffer = kzalloc(vpd_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + char *buffer;
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > + buffer = kzalloc(vpd_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!buffer)
> > + goto out;
> > if (scsi_get_vpd_page(sdev, 0x90, buffer, vpd_len))
> > goto out;
> >
>
> For 32 bytes, why not use the stack?
Because the buffer is a DMA target. You can't DMA to stack because of
padding and cacheline issues.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists