[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <513A70CF.9010800@suse.cz>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 00:14:23 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 8250.nr_uarts broken in 3.7
On 03/09/2013 12:10 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 03/08/2013 11:58 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 03/08/2013 11:49 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 11:47:01PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>>> Yeah, I agree this is ugly. Just re-definining MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX at
>>>> the end of the file should do the trick (followed by
>>>> "module_param(nr_uarts, uint, 0644)").
>>>
>>> For some reason, I thought I had tried that. Maybe I didn't. I'll look
>>> into it again.
>>
>> I see. Because we would re-define some global variables. What if we put
>> module_param into a function?
>
> Something like this?
> #ifdef MODULE
> static void __unused splat(void) {
I meant __used. It should make no difference though.
> # undef MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX
> # define MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX "8250."
> module_param_cb(nr_uarts, ¶m_ops_uint, &nr_uarts, 0644);
> ...
> }
> #endif
>
> Not nice, but should work. The other way is to have those in a separate
> file linked to 8250 (to avoid re-definition errors).
>
> thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists