[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130309204242.GA17303@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 21:42:42 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>
Cc: lucas.de.marchi@...il.com, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Split remaining calls to
call_usermodehelper_fns()
On 03/08, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>
> @@ -571,9 +572,17 @@ void do_coredump(siginfo_t *siginfo)
> goto fail_dropcount;
> }
>
> - retval = call_usermodehelper_fns(helper_argv[0], helper_argv,
> - NULL, UMH_WAIT_EXEC, umh_pipe_setup,
> - NULL, &cprm);
> + sub_info = call_usermodehelper_setup(helper_argv[0],
> + helper_argv, NULL, GFP_KERNEL,
> + umh_pipe_setup, NULL, &cprm);
> + if (!sub_info) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s failed to allocate memory\n",
> + __func__);
Why?
> + argv_free(helper_argv);
> + goto fail_dropcount;
> + }
> +
> + retval = call_usermodehelper_exec(sub_info, UMH_WAIT_EXEC);
I do not really like another argv_free() here... How about
retval = -ENOMEM;
info = call_usermodehelper_setup(...);
if (info)
retval = call_usermodehelper_fns(...);
argv_free();
?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists