[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130309042658.GB1396@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 23:26:58 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG_ON(nd->inode != parent->d_inode);
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:38:33PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:16:09PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Goodie. Your bug reports gave me heartburn. But it sounds like we have an
> > > angle on all of the ones you've seen now?
> > >
> > > Or have I forgotten about some case?
> >
> > To be honest I've lost track of the whole collection.
> > Let me repull your latest tree, and see what falls out.
> > (I'll turn off CONFIG_USER_NS for now too until that gets fixed)
>
> It was CONFIG_UTS_NS that tripped you.
>
> Since I can trigger this with /proc/self/ns/mnt/a you are going to be
> able to compile this one out.
fwiw, the other namespace procfs files look like they have the same bug
I just triggered it again on /proc/571/task/571/ns/net
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists