[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUWxiLtw4xpe-Xt9peCpUMn-vsTHh4hDf=m5xs3pAf7nA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 23:22:43 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/26] x86, irq: Add realloc_irq_and_cfg_at()
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
>> + * irq_realloc_desc - allocate irq descriptor for irq that is already reserved
>
> Which begs the question - why was it not allocated when it was reserved?
The reasons for not allocating them during reserving:
1. only several pins in ioapic are used, allocate for them pin, will
waste memory for not used one.
2. relocate later could make sure irq_desc is allocated on local node ram.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists