[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1362819234.1220.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 09:53:54 +0100
From: Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@...ers.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [3.9-rc1] irq 16: nobody cared (was [3.9-rc1] very poor
interrupt responses)
Am Freitag, den 08.03.2013, 21:19 -0500 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2013, Peter Hurley wrote:
>
> > [ +linux-usb ]
> >
> > On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 14:12 -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > > Hello folks,
> > >
> > > I am noticing since rc0 and now rc1, very poor interrupt handling. Keyboard response, mouse movements, display refreshing etc. General input/display sluggishness. Did something break IRQ handling somewhere? I need to validate if this happens with X not running also if it is i915 related somehow. The behavor is noticed in a console login however.
> > >
> > > Device: Lenovo W500 laptop
> >
> > Hi Shawn,
> >
> > Unhandled interrupts is the problem.
> >
> > Is the device below being id'd properly?
> > If you remove this device, does the problem go away?
>
> Does either of the kernels in question have commit 0f815a0a700b (USB:
> UHCI: fix IRQ race during initialization)? That commit was added to
> fix precisely this sort of thing.
I think so:
$ git describe
v3.9-rc1-211-g47b3bc9
$ git branch --contains 0f815a0a700b
* master
>
> Alan Stern
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists