linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] dmatest: update the module to use debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcN-W3B+pfHDSFwvQuEidYD81JagNNkrbHXVj7wkaNmOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:12:07 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.jf.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] dmatest: update the module to use debugfs

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 8 March 2013 21:11, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 11:50 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:09:24AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> > The first approach to get dmatest module more flexible and easier to play with.
>>> > The amount of patches could be reduced, but I would like to get a comments
>>> > first on smaller pieces. The entire series creates dmatest.txt file in the
>>> > Documentation folder. Similar description is scattered through the commit
>>> > messages.
>>> >
>>> > Module was tested on Intel Medfield and Lynxpoint systems with dw_dmac DMA
>>> > controller embedded.
>>> Overall the series looks good. I think it can applied in this form as well.
>>
>> Viresh, so, you are the only one who speaks about reducing amount of
>> patches. Do you think is better to either reduce, or leave as is? In
>> case of go with smaller amount, could you provide simple scheme which
>> patch should be merged with which?

> I have been damn busy with Linaro Connect last week and couldn't review all
> patches too. Probably you can just go ahead with this patchset only as Vinod
> is okay with it.

It seems Vinod is on vacation. So, take your time to finish review. I
appreciate it.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/