linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/3] genirq: Do not consider the irqs with disabling and IRQF_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1363024396.31506.60.camel@cliu38-desktop-build>
Date:	Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:53:16 +0800
From:	Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
To:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] genirq: Do not consider the irqs with disabling and
 IRQF_NO_SUSPEND


Meet some issues when operating one ioapic chip irq which
is set with _NO_SUSPEND flag and calling irq_set_irq_wake().

Written the below patches, thanks your time to review.

[PATCH 1/3] x86, io_apic: Adding the flag IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE
[PATCH 2/3] genirq: Do not consider the irqs with disabling and IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
[PATCH 3/3] genirq: Give warning in case calling irq_set_irq_wake with _NO_SUSPEND flag


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/