[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVNuJa0i9gtUWP2tVexwjKF0k1MJ2bA9V5M28LUWFJt5DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:31:03 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ldv-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/core/devio.c: Don't use GFP_KERNEL while we cannot
reset a storage device
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Alexey Khoroshilov
<khoroshilov@...ras.ru> wrote:
> As it was described by Oliver Neukum in commit acbe2fe
> "USB: Don't use GFP_KERNEL while we cannot reset a storage device":
>
> Memory allocations with GFP_KERNEL can cause IO to a storage device
> which can fail resulting in a need to reset the device. Therefore
> GFP_KERNEL cannot be safely used between usb_lock_device()
> and usb_unlock_device(). Replace by GFP_NOIO.
>
> The patch fixes the same issue in usb/core/devio.c.
> All the allocations fixed are under usb_lock_device() from usbdev_do_ioctl().
I am wondering why the device lock is needed for usbdev_do_ioctl()? Looks
device lock isn't required for USB transfer of kernel driver.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists