[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1363010968.12608.6.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:09:28 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] tracing/kdb: remove redundant checking
This is Jason's code.
Jason, please give an Ack or Nack.
Thanks,
-- Steve
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 15:13 +0800, zhangwei(Jovi) wrote:
> trace_empty is checking in while-loop, so the previous checking
> is totally redundant, and more worse, the first trace entry is losted.
>
> so remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c
> index 3c5c5df..6489b2e 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c
> @@ -57,8 +57,7 @@ static void ftrace_dump_buf(int skip_lines, long cpu_file)
> ring_buffer_read_start(iter.buffer_iter[cpu_file]);
> tracing_iter_reset(&iter, cpu_file);
> }
> - if (!trace_empty(&iter))
> - trace_find_next_entry_inc(&iter);
> +
> while (!trace_empty(&iter)) {
> if (!cnt)
> kdb_printf("---------------------------------\n");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists