[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130311145435.GB26394@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:54:35 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Mihnea Dobrescu-Balaur <mihneadb@...il.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, jeremy@...p.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: replace kmalloc and then memcpy with kmemdup
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 01:23:36PM +0200, Mihnea Dobrescu-Balaur wrote:
Are there performance improvements to doing it this way?
> Signed-off-by: Mihnea Dobrescu-Balaur <mihneadb@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> index c3dae2e..9620644 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> @@ -1203,11 +1203,10 @@ static int blkif_recover(struct blkfront_info *info)
> int j;
>
> /* Stage 1: Make a safe copy of the shadow state. */
> - copy = kmalloc(sizeof(info->shadow),
> + copy = kmemdup(info->shadow, sizeof(info->shadow),
> GFP_NOIO | __GFP_REPEAT | __GFP_HIGH);
> if (!copy)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - memcpy(copy, info->shadow, sizeof(info->shadow));
>
> /* Stage 2: Set up free list. */
> memset(&info->shadow, 0, sizeof(info->shadow));
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists