linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10-tmp] workqueue: implement workqueue with custom worker attributes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACvQF523Xeocr-wuu4iBG5ccG4j7K9tK1b687ddqgwszVi6f=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:42:29 +0800
From:	Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	axboe@...nel.dk, jmoyer@...hat.com, zab@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10-tmp] workqueue: implement workqueue with
 custom worker attributes

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hey, Lai.
>
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 06:34:33PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> > This patchset contains the following 31 patches.
>> >
>> >  0001-workqueue-make-sanity-checks-less-punshing-using-WAR.patch
>>
>> >  0002-workqueue-make-workqueue_lock-irq-safe.patch
>>
>> workqueue_lock protects too many things. We can introduce different locks
>> for different purpose later.
>
> I don't know.  My general attitude toward locking is the simpler the
> better.  None of the paths protected by workqueue_lock are hot.
> There's no actual benefit in making them finer grained.
>
>> >  0023-workqueue-implement-get-put_pwq.patch
>>
>> I guess this patch and patch25 may have very deep issue VS RCU.
>
> Hmmm... scary.  I suppose you're gonna elaborate on the review of the
> actual patch?
>
>> >  0024-workqueue-prepare-flush_workqueue-for-dynamic-creati.patch
>> >  0025-workqueue-perform-non-reentrancy-test-when-queueing-.patch
>> >  0026-workqueue-implement-apply_workqueue_attrs.patch
>> >  0027-workqueue-make-it-clear-that-WQ_DRAINING-is-an-inter.patch
>> >  0028-workqueue-reject-increasing-max_active-for-ordered-w.patch
>> >  0029-cpumask-implement-cpumask_parse.patch
>> >  0030-driver-base-implement-subsys_virtual_register.patch
>> >  0031-workqueue-implement-sysfs-interface-for-workqueues.patch
>>
>>
>> for 1~13,15~22,26~28, please add Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>

OK, Also add my Reviewed-by to 23~25.

>
> Done.
>

I didn't see you updated branch in your tree.

Thanks,
Lai

> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/