[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UOeWaLDkycm40vGy3jPT8cPagr8WAjHG5Ukckd2+kTcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:05:33 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@...sung.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Yuvaraj Kumar <yuvaraj.cd@...il.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Girish Shivananjappa <girish.shivananjappa@...aro.org>,
"bhushan.r" <bhushan.r@...sung.com>,
"sreekumar.c" <sreekumar.c@...sung.com>,
Prashanth G <prashanth.g@...sung.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
"Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] i2c: mux: Add i2c-arbitrator-cros-ec 'mux' driver
Wolfram,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> The i2c-arbitrator-cros-ec driver implements the arbitration scheme
> that the Embedded Controller (EC) on the ARM Chromebook expects to use
> for bus multimastering. This i2c-arbitrator-cros-ec driver could also
> be used in other places where standard I2C bus arbitration can't be
> used and two extra GPIOs are available for arbitration.
>
> This driver is based on code that Simon Glass added to the i2c-s3c2410
> driver in the Chrome OS kernel 3.4 tree. The current incarnation as a
> mux driver is as suggested by Grant Likely. See
> <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1877311/> for some history.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@...sung.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Handle of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node() failure more properly by
> changing init order.
> - Don't warn on -EPROBE_DEFER from calls that could return it.
> - Move to module_platform_driver(). As we pull in parts of the system
> that rely on devices under this i2c bus we'll need to make sure they
> can handle the fact that they'll be initted later now.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Renamed to i2c-arbitrator-cros-ec.
> - Documented "microsecond" properties as optional; removed
> "bus-arbitration" prefix since it was just extra wordy.
> - Split GPIOs into two properties to make it cleaner.
> - Capitalized I2C in freeform text.
> - Get 'active low' from device tree.
>
> .../bindings/i2c/i2c-arbitrator-cros-ec.txt | 76 +++++++
> drivers/i2c/muxes/Kconfig | 11 +
> drivers/i2c/muxes/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arbitrator-cros-ec.c | 222 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 311 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-arbitrator-cros-ec.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-arbitrator-cros-ec.c
Is there anything you'd like done before landing this patch for 3.10?
It's been reviewed by Stephen Warren (thanks Stephen!). From what I
remember from Olof's talk at ELC it seems like the best thing would be
to merge part 1 through i2c tree and then ask Olof to merge parts 2
and 3 (the dts bits) through the arm-soc tree.
I believe you could also add a "Tested-by" from Naveen to patch #1.
He sent a tested by for parts 2 and 3 so must have also tested part 1
(the other two don't function without it).
Please let me know--I'm happy to spin with any changes needed. :)
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists