[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <513E0471.6@semaphore.gr>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:21:05 +0200
From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 linux-next] cpufreq: conservative: Use an inline function
to evaluate freq_target
> On 6 March 2013 22:15, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr> wrote:
>> Use an inline function to evaluate freq_target to avoid duplicate code.
>>
>> Also, define a macro for the default frequency step.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Hi Rafael,
Could you please let me know if this patchset is going to be
applied or not?
Thank you in advance for your time,
Stratos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists