[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130311164309.GG13679@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:43:09 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] perf: Fix vmalloc ring buffer free function
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:26:33PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 12:21 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > pg_nr = offset >> page_shift;
> > > pg_offset = offset & (1 << page_shift) - 1;
> > >
> > > You just wrecked that.
> > >
> > > > handle->page &= rb->nr_pages - 1;
> >
> > here's ^^^ where the handle->page becomes 0 due to (rb->nr_pages == 0)
>
> then that'll be &= -1, which is a nop, no?
ugh.. should have been: '..due to (rb->nr_pages == 1)' as from:
+ rb->nr_pages = nr_pages ? 1 : 0;
if it's 0, it never make it throught the perf_output_begin
>
> Also, you wrecked it for anything that uses some intermediate page
> order (we currently don't).
I'll put that hunk back then:
- handle->page = offset >> (PAGE_SHIFT + page_order(rb));
+ /* page is allways 0 for CONFIG_PERF_USE_VMALLOC option */
+ handle->page = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
I did not know there were other plans for that, seemed useless
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists