[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <513E2A0A.3080008@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:01:30 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mtosatti@...hat.com" <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: kvm: reset the bootstrap processor when it gets
an INIT
On 2013-03-11 19:51, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Intel:
>>> CPU 1 CPU 2 in a guest mode
>>> send INIT
>>> send SIPI
>>> INIT vmexit
>>> vmxoff
>>> reset and start from SIPI vector
>>
>> Is SIPI sticky as well, even if the CPU is not in the wait-for-SIPI
>> state (but runnable and in vmxon) while receiving it?
>>
> That what they seams to be saying:
> However, an INIT and SIPI interrupts sent to a CPU during time when
> it is in a VMX mode are remembered and delivered, perhaps hours later,
> when the CPU exits the VMX mode
>
> Otherwise their exploit will not work.
Very weird, specifically as SIPI is not just a binary event but carries
payload. Will another SIPI event overwrite the previously "saved"
vector? We are deep into an underspecified area...
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists