[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130311194407.GB14738@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:44:07 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kdump: Set crashkernel_low automatically
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:39:56PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
> >> No need to use crashkernel_high, we can just cashkernel=X@Y instead.
> >
> > crashkernel=X@Y is little different. It assumes user knows the memory
> > map and location "Y" is fixed. There might not be any memory at "Y".
>
> then use crashkernel=4G?
But that will reserve 4G of memory. I just want 128/256 MB of memory
reserved for normal cases. This is even worse than crashkernel=X@Y.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists