[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130311201725.GD14738@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:17:25 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kdump: Set crashkernel_low automatically
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:59:44PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/11/2013 12:22 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >
> > So always reserving memory at highest address will break all the cases
> > which work without iommu and rely on swiotlb. I think first we need
> > to make sure that kdump works reliably with iommu on, and then try
> > to move to always reserving memory at higest possible address.
> >
>
> We should clearly always reserve an swiotlb window, *or*, probably much
> better, teach the kdump kernel to *make* an swiotlb window (by having a
> memory buffer in its reserved memory area into which it copies a chunk
> of low memory, just as we do for the bottom megabyte. If we are already
> in low memory that buffer becomes the swiotlb window, no copy necessary.)
This sounds like a good idea. It will require exporting how much memory
should be needed for swiotlb. And then kexec-tools should be able to
backup that memory area and make that memory available to second kernel.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists