linux-kernel - linux-next: unneeded merge in the security tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130312100950.e45ef0e721492ff0d5fd7c8d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:09:50 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Subject: linux-next: unneeded merge in the security tree

Hi all,

[James, I am not picking on you, just using your tree to illustrate a
point.]

The top commit in the security tree today is a merge of v3.9-rc2.  This
is a completely unnecessary merge as the tree before the merge was a
subset of v3.9-rc1 and so if the merge had been done using anything but
the tag, it would have just been a fast forward.  I know that this is now
deliberate behaviour on git's behalf, but isn't there some way we can
make this easier on maintainers who are just really just trying to pick a
new starting point for their trees after a release?  (at least I assume
that is what James was trying to do)

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped