lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <513ED047.9060507@huawei.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:50:47 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] cgroup: don't bother to resize pid array

When we open cgroup.procs, we'll allocate an buffer and store all tasks'
tgid in it, and then duplicate entries will be stripped. If that results
in a much smaller pid list, we'll re-allocate a smaller buffer.

But we've already sucessfully allocated memory and reading the procs
file is a short period and the memory will be freed very soon, so why
bother to re-allocate memory.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
---
 kernel/cgroup.c | 37 +++----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index be524ac..58ae040 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -3400,35 +3400,14 @@ static void pidlist_free(void *p)
 	else
 		kfree(p);
 }
-static void *pidlist_resize(void *p, int newcount)
-{
-	void *newlist;
-	/* note: if new alloc fails, old p will still be valid either way */
-	if (is_vmalloc_addr(p)) {
-		newlist = vmalloc(newcount * sizeof(pid_t));
-		if (!newlist)
-			return NULL;
-		memcpy(newlist, p, newcount * sizeof(pid_t));
-		vfree(p);
-	} else {
-		newlist = krealloc(p, newcount * sizeof(pid_t), GFP_KERNEL);
-	}
-	return newlist;
-}
 
 /*
  * pidlist_uniq - given a kmalloc()ed list, strip out all duplicate entries
- * If the new stripped list is sufficiently smaller and there's enough memory
- * to allocate a new buffer, will let go of the unneeded memory. Returns the
- * number of unique elements.
+ * Returns the number of unique elements.
  */
-/* is the size difference enough that we should re-allocate the array? */
-#define PIDLIST_REALLOC_DIFFERENCE(old, new) ((old) - PAGE_SIZE >= (new))
-static int pidlist_uniq(pid_t **p, int length)
+static int pidlist_uniq(pid_t *list, int length)
 {
 	int src, dest = 1;
-	pid_t *list = *p;
-	pid_t *newlist;
 
 	/*
 	 * we presume the 0th element is unique, so i starts at 1. trivial
@@ -3449,16 +3428,6 @@ static int pidlist_uniq(pid_t **p, int length)
 		dest++;
 	}
 after:
-	/*
-	 * if the length difference is large enough, we want to allocate a
-	 * smaller buffer to save memory. if this fails due to out of memory,
-	 * we'll just stay with what we've got.
-	 */
-	if (PIDLIST_REALLOC_DIFFERENCE(length, dest)) {
-		newlist = pidlist_resize(list, dest);
-		if (newlist)
-			*p = newlist;
-	}
 	return dest;
 }
 
@@ -3554,7 +3523,7 @@ static int pidlist_array_load(struct cgroup *cgrp, enum cgroup_filetype type,
 	/* now sort & (if procs) strip out duplicates */
 	sort(array, length, sizeof(pid_t), cmppid, NULL);
 	if (type == CGROUP_FILE_PROCS)
-		length = pidlist_uniq(&array, length);
+		length = pidlist_uniq(array, length);
 	l = cgroup_pidlist_find(cgrp, type);
 	if (!l) {
 		pidlist_free(array);
-- 
1.8.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ