linux-kernel - Re: torrent hash failures since 3.9.0-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130312071606.GA8900@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:16:06 +0800
From:	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
To:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: torrent hash failures since 3.9.0-rc1

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:48:10AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2013.03.12 at 14:44 +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:16:24AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On 2013.03.11 at 23:30 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:00:58AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks for reporting this problem.  My deepest apologies.
> > > > > 
> > > > > As Ted suggested, could you please try to use ext4 git tree?  I want to
> > > > > make sure whether this bug has been fixed by my lastest patch series or
> > > > > not.
> > > > 
> > > > It's definitely worth a try to compile the master branch of the ext4
> > > > tree and see if it reproduces or not.
> > > 
> > > I cannot reproduce the issue on top of "ext4.git dev", so fortunately
> > > the problem seems to be already fixed there.
> > > Thanks.
> > 
> > Great!  Thanks for the confirmation.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Do you guys have a hunch which commit is the actual fix? 
> > > (Maybe I will "bisect" it later today.)
> > 
> > I think maybe this two commits can fix it, but I am not sure which one
> > is the actual fix (I guess it is the former one, ;-) ).  Please try it
> > if you could bisect it.  Thanks in advance.
> > 
> >  * 079d7667af20876a59a1d9b0d4d1e15dcf17fa34
> >    ext4: fix wrong the number of the allocated blocks in
> > ext4_split_extent()
> 
> Your guess was right. The commit above is the actual fix.

Thank you so much for verifing it. :-)

Ted, I am wandering if we need to Cc this patch to stable kernel.  We
don't receive any report to complaint it, though, but it is worth
backporting it I think.

Regards,
                                                - Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/