[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130312082112.GB30665@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:21:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Timo Juhani Lindfors <timo.lindfors@....fi>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Nadia Yvette Chambers <nyc@...omorphy.com>,
yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip ] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Move hash_64() into .text.kprobe
section
* Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> @@ -31,7 +32,7 @@
> #error Wordsize not 32 or 64
> #endif
>
> -static inline u64 hash_64(u64 val, unsigned int bits)
> +static __kprobes inline u64 hash_64(u64 val, unsigned int bits)
> {
> u64 hash = val;
We should also, really, really fix the '__kprobes' misnomer and switch to
the '__noprobe' pattern or so. The naming does not make it obvious at all
that what we do here is to turn _off_ kprobing of select functions...
The only complication is that __kprobes is now present in 600+ places,
which will create merge conflicts. If you remind me during the next merge
window I can generate the rename on the spot and send it to Linus without
anyone having to carry the patch for too long.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists