linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, pci sta2x11-fixup: add function to access sta2x11 instance id

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130312005106.GB15494@mail.gnudd.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:51:06 +0100
From:	Davide Ciminaghi <ciminaghi@...dd.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, rubini@...dd.com, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
	giancarlo.asnaghi@...com, mturquette@...aro.org,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
	broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, pci sta2x11-fixup: add function to access sta2x11 instance id

On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 04:13:34PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 08 March 2013, Davide Ciminaghi wrote:
> > 
> > The sta2x11 instance id will be included in clock names to make them
> > unique in case of multiple sta2x11's living on the same machine.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Davide Ciminaghi <ciminaghi@...dd.com>
> 
> I might be missing something, but this seems counterintuitive. Shouldn't
> the clock names really be constant and independent of the instance?
> 
> The instance should be identified already by the dev_name, right?
>
Hi,

sorry for the delay.
Well, I actually wrote this some months ago, so I might also be missing
something (yes, I know I shouldn't :-).
If I understand well, I should call clk_register_* with dev pointing to
the struct device corresponding to the sta2x11 instance to which the clock
belongs and a constant name (while currently I set dev to NULL and use a
different name for each instance of the same clock, by postfixing the name
with an instance id).
You're probably right, even if looking at the code in drivers/clk/clk.c,
there's something I'm not sure about (and I cannot do any tests right now):

_clk_register() takes hw->init->name as clock name, where hw->init->name
should come from the second arg of clk_register_*, if I'm not wrong.
Then __clk_init does:

if (__clk_lookup(clk->name)) {
   	pr_debug("%s: clk %s already initialized\n", __func__, clk->name);
	ret = -EEXIST;
	goto out;
}

Is it actually possible registering multiple clocks with the same name ?
Sorry maybe I missed your point ...

Thanks and regards
Davide
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/